Enemy of the State Film Review
Enemy of the State Film Synopsis:
Robert Clayton Dean is a lawyer whose happy family life is turned upside down after meeting his college buddy at a lingerie shop by chance. Along with their swift conversation, his buddy cleverly slips a self-taken videotape assassination of a congressman into his bag. Unknown to Robert, his life begins to turn sour when he became the eye of a ruthless group of National Security Agents commanded by a belligerently ambitious Jon Voight, a high-ranking State Department official of the famed National Security Agency. Using sophisticated surveillance from snooping devices, every digital footprint left by Robert becomes a source of invasion to his private life as the villains tried every possible means to regain the video which is in Robert's possession.
What were the ethical (or moral) dilemmas in the movie? List four.
Dilemma 1 - The use of state of the art intelligence surveillance system effectively address terror threats and those activities that are hostile to the national security. The use of advance microchips, powerful computers and mass data storage devices has opened possibilities to keep track movements of people as well. Along with this development, there is so much power in the use of this technology as it offers vulnerability to infringe the rights of individual privacy. Privacy versus Security is the primary dilemma very obvious in this film.
Dilemma 2 - When all law enforcers are out to capture Robert, he has no other way to regain back his normal life but to face and outwit his detractors. Upon losing the incriminating video tape Robert have in possession, he lost a perfectly good chance to clear his name with all the so-called invented bad reputation induced into his character. The dilemma here is, Robert has nothing to prove about his innocence.
Dilemma 3 - Two of the major characters in the film(Robert's friend and the congressman) were murdered by National Security operatives because of self-serving motives. Where is justice? The dilemma here is that the victims didn't get justice especially if those who perpetuated the crime are ironically the crime busters themselves.
Dilemma 4 - There may be ongoing use of high-end surveillance gadgets that somehow need legal intervention on its appropriate use as in the case of this film, yet no body had to bring this issue into the judicial spotlight for further ethical scrutiny. The NSA's use of such surveillance gadgets are in fact of no legal basis and therefore intrusive and infringes privacy. The dilemma here is- who will expose such corrupt and exploitative operations, when all teams of the NSA department (in the film) are involved in the conspiracy of doing illegal activity. This is an issue probably true in real life situation as in the case of human-cloning where certain clinics clandestinely operate in secret laboratories.
How do the ethical theories apply to these dilemmas? You can choose just one theory for all of the dilemmas, or use different theories for each.
Privacy vs Security
The use of intelligence and surveillance system is undoubtedly a state of the art way to detect suspicious and potentially terrorist-related activity. The cost of this breakthrough would mean vulnerability to infringe privacy. On the other hand, because employing its use significantly helps save lives, there is societal tolerance on certain privacy given up in selected areas as evidently seen in most public places such as grocery stores, airports and transport stations. It is a perceivable trend in the future, that more and more surveillance gadgets will soon be installed as far as invading our homes. Man, in his moral and intellectual capacity, to some certain degree, favor security at the expense of privacy because of his moral obligation to mankind to prevent acts of terrorism by using technology as his weapon. This is a problem of moral obligation where privacy and security are the two conflicting issues that pose challenging solution. Additionally, the use of "security" as an issue, becomes a susceptible reason to mask real egoistic intentions which is most likely to personally intrude others. Transvaluation of values suggests that altruism is merely a particular form of egoism. With security favored over privacy, we shall expect that in the future, our privacy will be in the hands of those who operate surveillance systems and that without proper legal measures to govern its use, there is a likelihood that our lives will be threatened by the terrors that unscrupulous crime busters themselves breed.
Abuse of Position
In our quest to uphold moral ascendancy by following laws that govern our daily operation in life, there are cases when proving our innocence seems too elusive. There are so many orchestrated crime scenes and conspiracy to implicate the innocent and cover the real personalities that commit the actual crime. This is especially true when the conspirers are those who are in the influential government position. The use of surveillance electronic gadgets is one area in which our private lives can be altered instantaneously by some self-serving extremists as in the case of Robert. This is an example of pure greed; a reflection of a self-serving utilitarianist who are so obsessed about their own happiness and their indifference to other people's interests. They take advantage of their influence and position to feed on their egoistic motives.
Integrity of Work
Ethical principles are guiding precepts that are foundations of our laws. Those men who hold vital information including privates ones are ought to be morally and lawfully responsible in the conduct of their duty. The problem with the story is that men in the NSA are fueled with greed of power whose real intentions are covered up by the so-called national interests. It should be a moral duty of the higher appointing offices to carefully discern who will be the competent individuals to best fit to the positions in the NSA.
How were the dilemmas resolved in the movie? If you were the one facing the dilemma, what would you do?
Dilemmas of the abuse of position and Integrity of work as discussed above were not particularly resolved in the story. The story writer opted to point the focus on how the justice could possibly be achieved along with the animosity caused by intruding personal lives. Robert, being a lawyer, finally gets his retribution when he find his way to clash these ruthless NSA agents who are desperately recovering the assassination video from him and a group of mobster who is incidentally keeping with them a different video tape that will incriminate them. When the two groups hanged to their conflicting interests, they end up shooting each other. This illustrates a situation where commission of crimes has chained down so long that fair and just means of resolving the dilemma seems too impossible to achieve realistically. As I result, the protagonist tried to resolve his ordeal by playing exactly the same game as his enemies'. Although such resolution doesn't clearly adhere to the ethical principles in computing, it was a situation of moral problem that was finally solved by using the enemy's motivational purpose that results to a fair and square resolution.
If I am into the same situation, I would probably do the same strategy. Although Robert was too lucky to establish a point of common conflicting interest between the mob and the NSA operatives, this is a too good to happen in a real life scenario. With this, I still vow to uphold lawful and ethical principles in proving my innocence should this happen to me by soliciting assistance to higher authorities in the government.
